Most Active Stories
- Governor-Elect Asa Hutchinson Sets Up Website For Transition
- State Supreme Court Deliberates On Same-Sex Marriage
- Election: Fayetteville's LGBT Anti-Discrimination Measure An Arkansas Rarity
- Effort To Curtail Use Of Antipsychotic Drugs In Nursing Homes
- Is Open Carry Legal in Arkansas? Depends On Who You Ask.
Mayflower Oil Spill
Wed May 29, 2013
Lawsuit Against Exxon Claims Company Knowingly Concealed Pipeline Defects
A lawsuit has been filed against Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Pipeline Company, and the planners and developers of the Mayflower subdivision where a pipeline ruptured and spilled almost 150,000 gallons of oil into a neighborhood on March 29, 2013.
The lawsuit was filed by a group of Mayflower residents affected by the oil spill.
Claims made in the lawsuit include:
- Exxon was aware of problems with the pipeline before the oil spill and knowingly concealed pipeline defects.
- The pipeline was meant to carry crude oil and could not handle the more abrasive tar sands oil flowing through it. The abrasive tar sands oil created stress demands that led to dangerous conditions in which a rupture was inevitable.
- The oil spill has damaged the city of Mayflower and negatively impacted growth and property values of the entire community.
- Carcinogenic chemicals and other volatile compounds have been detected in the air near the spill site weeks after the spill.
- Exxon took 18 minutes to shut down the pipeline. Which is double the amount of time established for a "worst case scenario" in their own emergency response plan. This led to twice the amount of oil being spilled.
- Exxon was negligent in hiring the Center for Toxicology and Enviromental Health (CTEH) to monitor air and water safety. Members of Congress asked for British Petroleum to fire CTEH during the BP Gulf Oil Spill because they were alleged to promote corporate interests at the expense of public health.
Mayflower Oil Spill
Local & Regional News